National funding agencies provide a number of resources to assist faculty in the proposal writing process. Visit the following sites for helpful information, or find funding here.
National Science Foundation
The NSF is strengthening its commitment to proposal requirements. The CMMI Division, for example, strictly enforces compliancy, and sends a letter to PIs whose proposals are returned without review explaining their position. See RWR letter.
NEW MESSAGE FROM NSF REGARDING CHANGES TO PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS - EFFECTIVE 1/25/2016 - CLICK HERE
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, NSF'S FASTLANE WILL NOT PERMIT SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS AFTER 5:00:00.
Some common errors to avoid in complying to guidelines include:
- Single Copy Document: Collaborator list: NEW for 2016 - Must include a list of collaborators for each senior personnel, broken out by the following categories and in alphabetical order (collaborators and co-editors, gratuate advisors and postdoctoral sponsors, thesis advisor and postgraduate-scholar sponsor). Put your name and Lehigh University at the top of the page.
- Project Summary: MUST be submitted in the three text boxes if no special characters are included. If a PDF upload, must still include the three categories (overview, intellectual merit, broader impact).
- References: MUST include all authors (no "et al.")
- Data Management Plan: MUST be comprehensive. See data management plan tools.
- Biosketch: MUST be in exact NSF format (i.e. location of educational institutions; max of 10 products; 5 synergistic activities). NEW for 2016: Section on collaborators is eliminated. A separate document must now be uploaded (see item 1).
- Budget Justification: All travel must be justified and relevant to the project. 3 page limit.
- Project Description: MUST NOT include URLs. MUST include section "Broader Impacts."
- Project Description: MUST include all items mentioned in the GPG in the Results for Prior NSF Support section for grants with start dates in past 5 years (NEW for 2016).
(a) the NSF award number, amount and period of support;
(b) the title of the project;
(c) a summary of the results of the completed work, including accomplishments, described in two separate sections, related to the Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact activities supported by the award;
(d) publications resulting from the NSF award (if none, state "No publications were produced under this award");
(e) evidence of research products and their availability, including, but not limited to: data, publications, samples, physical collections, software, and models, as described in any Data Management Plan; and
(f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the relation of the completed work to the proposed.
- Letters of Collaboration: NEW for 2016 - Letters should only include the standard paragraph: “If the proposal submitted by Dr. [insert the full name of the Principal Investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources section of the proposal.”
The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov application guide is available on the NSF website.
National Institutes for Health
New PDF outlining changes for 2016 - EFFECTIVE 1/25/16: CLICK HERE.
NEW FOR 2016:
- Commons registration is required for all individuals participating in an NIH-funded project.
- Resubmission Applications: following one unsuccessful resubmission application, applicants may submit the same idea AS A NEW APPLICATION.
- Cover letter: Address cover letter to the Division of Receipt and Referral.
- Biosketches: per the new format, there is now a 5-page limit. Graphics figures and tables are NOT ALLOWED in a biosketch. Also, under research support, briefly indicate overall goals of the project and responsibilities of senior/key persons. DO NOT include person months or total project costs. See this link for the biosketch format template and sample: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm#biosketch
- Research Strategy: new talking points are recommended. See PDF link above for some details. Scientific rigor is a key focus.
- Vertebrate animals: 4 scientific assessment criteria: 1) description of procedures; 2) justifications; 3) minimizationof pain and distress; 4) euthenasia.
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: If using biological and/or chemical resources, a new document is required called "Authentication of Key Resources Plan" to be uploaded under "Other Attachments." See http://grants.nih.gov/grants/
guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-16- 011.html and http://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2016/01/29/authentication-of-key-biological-andor-chemical-resources-in-nih-grant-applications/
- New salary cap and graduate and postdoc stipend levels for FY 16: https://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/paybud/pages/salarystip.aspx
Forms-D application packages must be used.
Other helpful information: