Collaborative Research Opportunity (CORE) Grants

You are here

Overview


Awards: Up to $60,000

Submission Deadline: Spring

CORE grants provide up to $60,000 for conduct of research with the goal of establishing and growing productive and competitive multi-faculty research programs. The program supports faculty teams that, through their combinations of perspectives and capabilities, can distinguish themselves in the academic community, with partners and constituents in society, and with funding sources, for the novelty, relevance and value of their work. 

 
 
 
 

Program Description

The CORE program is part of Lehigh’s strategy for building a vital research portfolio that is responsive to the grand challenges of our society. Such challenges are complex and multifaceted. As such, they are best addressed by teams incorporating combinations of knowledge, skills, and perspectives. Multi- and inter-disciplinary teams can be positioned to identify questions not yet been posed, approaches not yet taken, problems not previously identified, and solutions not yet tried. Teams can thereby distinguish themselves in the academic community, with partners and constituents in society, and with funding sources, for the novelty, relevance and value of their work. We therefore provide support, through this program, for establishment and growth of faculty research teams, with the expressed purpose of enabling teams to earn sustained extramural support.

As described in detail below, a CORE proposal should describe an opportunity to establish a new multi-faculty research program, or to add a substantial and enduring new element to an existing program. In each case, applicants should begin with a clear vision for the future of their program, describing how the work will be of value to academic and constituent communities including those expected to provide sustained support. The statement of opportunity should further include a description of how the group will distinguish itself through the novelty of its ideas, approach and/or composition. Applicants should write clearly and convincingly about their potential impact and competitive position.

Teams must describe, as specifically as possible, their paths to sustained extramural support. A strong application will identify what work, if successfully completed, would provide others with compelling reasons to invest in the project. Often this involves identification of what are currently seen as obstacles to the long-term viability of the program – such as the unproven nature of the approach or the absence of a track record among the team members – and proposing a plan to reduce or eliminate these obstacles. Groups should identify programs for which they expect to qualify, and should plan to pursue external funding within six months after the end of the award.

With the understanding that outcomes cannot be guaranteed, teams should be eager to capitalize on unexpected results, and should approach their planning with a sense of agility. The ability of the team to define ways in which it can distinguish itself in the long term may therefore be as important as the potential of the specific project described in the application. Teams are also strongly encouraged, taking advantage of their multidisciplinary nature, to identify multiple sources to which they can offer value, thereby increasing the stability of the program over time.

Funding for the CORE program is provided by the Smith Fund for Research and Innovation in Science and Engineering for projects in the natural sciences and engineering, and by university funds for projects in all fields.

 

Award

A CORE grant provides funding of up to $60,000. The actual budget must be commensurate with the specific needs of the research project. Generally, it is expected that the awardees are ready and eager to commence on the proposed work and able to complete the project within 12 months from the start date. To allow time for recruiting of students and other preparatory work such as preparation and approval of protocols or other factors related to the nature of the work, the project start may be delayed for up to six months. See instructions below regarding the project timeline.The earliest start date is June 1st.

 

Eligibility

The proposed project must involve at least two tenure-track faculty members. Like major co-authors of a scholarly publication, each investigator should have contributed to the conception of the program and preparation of the application. At least two should be clearly committed to ongoing involvement in the project and should, collectively, be capable of sustaining it.

Transient involvement of additional faculty and students to translate or transfer ideas or approaches from one area to another is welcomed. Joint faculty commitments to students who serve to translate or synthesize ideas can be particularly effective.

All team members must have made timely submission of all reports and other required materials under all prior internal grant awards. A faculty member with a current Lehigh internal grant may apply as a member of a team, provided that team composition is different and the project goals and scope of work are significantly different from those of the current award.

The team will designate one member as Principal Investigator (PI). The PI will often be a team member who has taken a leadership role in conception of the project and is expected to have an ongoing leadership role and/or particular ongoing commitment to the program. The PI will receive all correspondence, manage the budget, and be responsible for reporting. 

 

Allowable Costs (REVIEW THIS)

Awards may not be used to replace or to supplement current funding. A FIG award may not be used to support work within the scope of a pending grant application or an active or recently completed research grant. This does not preclude use of a FIG award to take a project in a new direction that is clearly beyond its current scope, including steps to qualify a project for funding from a new source. Funds may not be used for remodeling or alteration of facilities, faculty salaries or tuition. Grant funds must be expended in furtherance of the goals of the project as described in the proposal. 

  • Purchase of research materials including books unavailable through the library system

  • Access to off-campus research materials

  • Lab supplies

  • Travel necessary to perform research

  • Manuscript preparation

  • Necessary publication costs, costs of performing research and effectively disseminating outcomes. 

  • Travel to disseminate outcomes may be supported, but needs to be carefully justified.  

All expenditures must be in compliance with Lehigh’s Travel and Business Expense Policy

Non-allowable Costs

  • Awards may not be used to replace or to supplement current funding.

  • An award may not be used to support work within the scope of a pending grant application or an active or recently completed research grant. However, awards are intended to enable major programs to be assembled from existing strengths. Efforts toward significant expansion of the scope of existing programs and to establish teams of existing program leaders wherein the whole exceeds the sum of the parts are invited.

  • Funds may not be used for remodeling or alteration of facilities, faculty salaries or tuition. 

  • Purchase of general-purpose equipment and computers

  • Renovations

  • Visiting faculty

  • Course development

  • Purchase of reprints

  • Reimbursement of costs incurred prior to submission of the application.

This list provides some examples, and is not exhaustive.  If you have any questions about allowable/unallowable expenses, please contact our office.  You may also consult the Travel and Business Expense Policy for further information.

Grant funds must be expended in furtherance of the goals of the project as described in the proposal. 

 

How to Apply


Application Details

Submit your application through Lehigh’s InfoReady portal.  InfoReady will prompt you for the following summary details: 

  1. Descriptive project title - suitable for publication on our public web site.

  2. Name, Department, Position Title of each participating faculty member. 

    1. One faculty member must be the main correspondent and will be responsible for all deliverables and management of the budget. 

    2. All co-PIs must provide approval of the proposal submission

  3. Budget requested

  4. IRB/IACUC status - refer to our Research Integrity site for requirements.

  5. Abstract: a 250-word abstract suitable for a sophisticated lay audience, suitable for publication on our web site. The abstract should describe the project’s broad significance, the proposed activities and the project’s intended results.

 
Body of Proposal

In the proposal upload section, the following must be uploaded to the online system as a single pdf. Page margins must be at least one inch. Exclusive of any figures, text must be 11 point or larger:

1) Narrati​ve

A proposal narrative, not to exceed six pages, that enables reviewers to judge the merits of the project using the criteria listed above. Please adhere to the following outline:

a) Background, context and long-term goals.

  • Describe the long-term goals and potential of the research program, beyond the initial period of CORE support. Describe how the program could overcome existing barriers including often higher evidentiary bars to marginalized perspectives or subject matter, open up new possibilities, lead to innovation in practice, or otherwise merit attention and support.

  • Describe the project in the context of the backgrounds, capabilities and research interests of the faculty members involved. Highlight any unique combination of background, prior experience and capabilities that are being brought to bear on the project. This section should enable the reader to fully appreciate how the team could distinguish itself.

  • Identify the most critical barriers to moving forward with the project, with emphasis on what is required to convince others of the substantial merits of the research program. This may relate to the novelty and unproven nature of the team’s approach, lack of a track record of joint publication, etc.

b) Project plan

  • Against the background provided in the previous section, describe the work you plan to undertake and its expected outcomes. Make it clear to reviewers that you have devised a well-crafted plan that makes good use of talent, experience and existing resources. After reading this section, reviewers should appreciate how expected outcomes would address the critical barriers that you identified in the previous section.

c) Plans for Continuation

Identify expected sources of extramural support. For each, include: 

  • the agency or organization and any recurring or special program to which you plan to apply, and any known submission deadlines.

  • a description of how the project will be responsive to the funding source’s priorities and/or the requirements of the specific program.

  • a description of how funding through this source would advance the project in accord with your long-term plans. Continuation plans may include intent to apply for one or more large multi-investigator grants, and/or a combination of single- or multi-investigator grants that, collectively, will enable the group to continue its work. The team is expected to be agile and entrepreneurial. In addition to identification of specific sources as outlined above, applicants may cite agency priorities and plans that align with the team’s goals and capabilities, thereby supporting an expectation of success in future sustenance and growth of the program.

 

2) Timeline

Provide a timeline for completion of the proposed work in simple, readable form such as a short paragraph or simple diagram. The earliest start date is June 1st. The start date may be delayed for up to six months as necessary for reasons such as recruiting students, seasonal factors in conducting fieldwork, or preparation of regulatory protocols. Unless justified based on the nature of the work involved, the work should generally be completed within 12 months of the start.

 

3) Budget 

  • If matching funds will be used or in-kind resources dedicated to the project, specify these including amounts and sources.

  • Your proposed budget, not including any cost sharing, may be up to $60,000.

  • Your budget must be appropriate for the proposed work, and the work you propose must be appropriate for your goals.

 

4) Biosketches

Include short-form biographical sketches for each of the faculty members involved in the project. You may use the form prescribed by any federal agency or a listing, not to exceed two pages, of educational preparation, research activity and relevant publications, presentations, etc.

 

5) Grant Activity

List of all current and pending internal and external grants of all faculty involved in the project, including title, award amount, funding period and funding agency. For each, indicate either “no relationship,” or succinctly describe the relationship between the work supported by the grant and the proposed FIG project.

 

Review Process & Evaluation Criteria


Lehigh’s Internal Review Committee (IRC) will review proposals. IRC members are nominated by their deans in accord with their experience and representation of the scope of research endeavors at Lehigh. As part of the review process, applicants may be asked to present their plans to the IRC.

Reviewers will be reading and evaluating proposals within and across subject areas. Proposals should therefore describe the project and its import in a manner that can be readily appreciated by non-specialists. Details necessary for evaluation by specialists should be kept as concise as possible.

Final selections for funding will be made by the Vice President and Associate Provost for Research and Graduate Studies.

Reviewers will evaluate each proposal according to each of the following criteria. While reviewers may judge that some criteria are more critical than others for a given project, these criteria will form the entire basis for evaluation. The following will be provided, verbatim, in instructions to reviewers:

  • Opportunity, originality and potential impact. Do the applicants describe an opportunity to build a sustained multi-investigator research program with broad impact? Do they identify a field of study or application of rising importance? Do they identify distinguishing characteristics of their approach or their combination of talents, experience, capabilities and perspectives? Could the novelty of their approach, the broad importance of the problems being addressed to the field and/or to the world at large, and the constitution of the team confer a distinct advantage over time

  • Quality of the research plan. Do the applicants present a well-conceived plan for use of CORE funding? Have they identified critical questions about the feasibility or promise of their approach, or about the long-term importance and viability of their program, and focused their plan on addressing those questions? Have the applicants proposed a sound research plan that makes good use of their talents and existing physical and programmatic resources? Is the budget appropriate for the scope of the plan? Is the proposed timeline appropriate?

  • Continuation plan. Do the applicants describe a sound plan for pursuing funding for continuation of the program? Have the applicants identified potential funding sources and cited prerequisites to success with those sources? Does their vision for the project serve the missions and priorities of those sources? Do they describe a funding strategy, considering potential paths such as qualification for major center grants and/or coordinated use of multiple smaller grants? If expected outcomes are achieved, are the applicants likely to be competitive in the near term?

  • Long-term potential and strategic fit. Is there potential for continued growth of the program at Lehigh? Is it likely that the program offers a significant opportunity for multiple co-investigators, thereby assuring their ongoing commitment? Might it, over time, naturally draw in others or establish connections with other programs? Is future development of the program fully supported by existing or planned facilities and programs? Does the project have the potential to establish or enhance connections between academic work and broader concerns?

 

Expenditures and Grant Management


If awarded, an individual research account will be established.  The PI will be responsible for assuring that the funds are spent: 

Absent justification for no-cost extension, funds remaining at the end of the 12-month award period will revert to our office to support future research projects.  

 

General Requirements

Collegial exchange. Awardees will be expected to make brief presentations of their programs and plans at an open symposium to be held early in the funding period and/or to provide written materials about their projects for sharing with Lehigh colleagues.

Required reports. Awardees will be required to submit end-of-project reports and follow-up outcome assessments, using reporting forms provided by the Office of the Vice President and Associate Provost for Research and Graduate Studies.

Research integrity. Conduct of research must adhere to university policies, including those pertaining to research involving human subjects, vertebrate animals, and hazardous materials. Information on these is available at the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) website.

 

Award History

View list of previous awardees here.

 

Contact Information

Questions and requests for additional information should be directed to VPResearch@lehigh.edu.